arxiv.org·2026/10/20
部署LLM需在跨云异构机群上为每作业选择加速器、并行、引擎、副本数等约140个变量,且作业争夺共享容量,不同并行配置的吞吐与单位token成本可差数倍。现有系统只解决局部问题;Koi用固定因果DAG X→V→Y连接决策、运行时中介与结果,RLM层次提出可证伪机制和候选,确定性成分基于AIConfigurator预测打分,CUSUM、ICP与Beta置信度按周期遥测自校准,联合选择器在容量约束下优化集群计划。在真实GCP异构集群和LLMServingSim 2.0模拟集群上,与CP-SAT、EvoX、OpenEvolve等基线相比,作者报告真实集群goodput比最强基线OpenEvolve高1.18×、$/token降20%,短时模拟goodput高45.24%、$/token降31.23%。消融显示纯语言模型综合分最低,加入确定性工具后大幅提升,完整系统最高,且因果不确定性随证据累积下降。增益主要来自LLM外围结构而非模型本身,但实验未达收敛条件,新增决策轴须有至少一个遥测中介。
为什么重要 跨云异构推理集群的部署规划可参考其「LLM 只提议、确定性组件打分」的分层设计,避免直接信任模型预测适合 做多云异构推理集群调度与容量规划的工程师
部署大语言模型(LLM)需要在跨云、区域和市场的约 140 个其他变量中选择正确的加速器、并行化策略、引擎配置和副本数。这些决策相互交织,随着作业在不断变化的工作负载上争夺共享容量,最佳集群范围计划会不断变化。我们提出 Koi,一个用于异构多云机群的自校准集群规划器。
Koi 使用递归语言模型(RLM)层级结构提出假设并对部署进行推理,而确定性组件预测服务行为、对候选方案评分并控制放置。它将推理行为表示为一个固定的因果图,连接决策(例如加速器、并行化)、运行时中介因素(例如 KV-cache 压力、通信开销)和结果(例如延迟、吞吐量)。每次部署都会增强或减弱特定范围内的因果关系,构建一本全面的推理手册,规划器利用该手册指导未来决策。
按作业的配置被组合成集群范围计划,并根据服务目标、资源约束、SLO 风险和成本进行评估。在各项基准测试中,Koi 的有效吞吐量比最强基线高 1.18 倍,同时在真实异构集群中将 $/token 降低 20%。消融实验分离出 Koi 架构的贡献:纯语言模型获得综合得分 35.3,同一模型配备 Koi 的确定性工具后达到 51.6,完整的 Koi 规划器达到 70.8。
Deploying a large language model (LLM) requires choosing the right accelerator, parallelization strategy, engine configuration, and replica count amongst ~140 other variables across clouds, regions, and markets.
These decisions are intertwined, and the best cluster-wide plan continually changes as jobs contend for shared capacity on shifting workloads.
We present Koi, a self-calibrating cluster planner for heterogeneous, multi-cloud fleets.
Koi uses a Recursive Language Model (RLM) hierarchy to propose hypotheses and reason over deployment while deterministic components predict serving behavior, score candidates, and control placement.
It represents inference behavior as a fixed causal graph linking decisions (e.g., accelerator, parallelism), runtime mediators (e.g., KV-cache pressure, communication overhead), and outcomes (e.g., latency, throughput).
Each deployment strengthens or weakens scoped causal relationships, building a comprehensive playbook for inference that the planner employs to guide future decisions.
Job-wise configurations are composed into cluster-wide plans and evaluated against serving objectives, resource constraints, SLO risks, and cost.
Across benchmarks, Koi achieves 1.18x greater goodput than the strongest baseline while reducing $/token by 20% in a real heterogeneous cluster.
Ablations isolate the contribution of Koi's architecture: a pure language model attains a composite score of 35.3, the same model equipped with Koi's deterministic tools reaches 51.6, and the full Koi planner reaches 70.8.



EVIDENCE / METHODS
要点
每个作业约有 140 个配置参数,单作业候选至少 2140 种,集群级计划组合爆炸无法枚举
原版排版与图表 · 手机无法内嵌时可在浏览器打开。PDF 插件内选文不能传给网页助手。