alignmentforum.org·2026/10/03·Lorxus
为什么重要 为不同世界模型但预测一致的推理者互操作提供理论思路，缺数学与工程验证。
认识论状态：这是智能体基础与语言哲学中一个有前景但奇怪的研究方向。一座半建成的概念塔，砂浆和油漆都还没干：请在创新时原谅我们的混乱。其中一些内容，我有信心基本正确；一些只是具有启发性；很可能许多内容错误或不完整。当然，它缺少真正正确所需的数学，这让我困扰。
这里的先前工作奇怪而薄弱：Gärdenfors、Tarski、Gentner 和 later Mohists 是奇怪的同伴，我无法判断这是警告信号，还是一条我能特别容易跨越的护城河。我最近曾在 Berkeley 一个名字辉煌的场地，在一个有希腊名字的会议上，把其中最简单的部分作为演讲给出。给 @johnswentworth，但
(Epistemic status: A promising but weird research direction in agent foundations and philosophy of language.
A half-built conceptual tower whose mortar and paint are both still wet: please excuse our mess while we innovate.
Some of it, I'm confident in as pretty much right; some of it is merely suggestive; probably much of it is wrong or incomplete.
Certainly it lacks the math it'd need to be truly correct, which gnaws at me.
The prior art here is strange and thin: Gärdenfors, Tarski, Gentner, and the later Mohists make for odd bedfellows, and I can't tell whether that's a warning sign or a moat I can peculiarly easily clear.
I gave the simplest parts of this as a talk extremely recently in Berkeley at a luminously-named venue for a conference with a Grecian name . For @johnswentworth , bu…