RECAP: Looking Once Is Not Enough for Vision-Language Reasoning

Long chain-of-thought reasoning improves vision-language models (VLMs), but it also exposes a temporal grounding failure: as generation unfolds, models may drift from image evidence while reinforcement learning still provides only a final-answer reward.

We study this gap through visual revisit, a temporally localized reactivation of image evidence during reasoning.

Across three VLM backbones, revisit peaks are predictive of correctness and causally linked to performance: masking them degrades accuracy more than masking non-peaks, while injecting revisit-like peaks into failed rollouts partially restores correct answers.

Control analyses show that this signal is not explained by raw attention strength, uncertainty, logit margin, or hidden-state norm.

We propose RECAP, a GRPO-compatible training method that turns detached revisit traces into a credit-assignment signal.

RECAP uses revisit-conditioned advantage estimation, dynamic discounting, and gated value prediction to propagate final rewards through visually important reasoning steps, without extra rewards, additional rollouts, or inference-time changes.

Across Qwen2.5-VL-7B, InternVL3-8B, and LLaVA-OV-7B, RECAP consistently improves over GRPO and VPPO, yielding $+6.1$--$+6.5$ HallusionBench gains over the SFT base while preserving reasoning and text-only performance.

Results on larger LoRA-tuned models, Chinese zero-shot benchmarks, visual perturbations, and human evaluation further demonstrate robust improvements in image-grounded reasoning.