arxiv.org·2026/10/23
针对云–本地具身智能体的能力–延迟矛盾,CARE 用 critic 引导的有状态自适应升级:critic 依共享上下文与本地提案计算置信度,按 θesc<θret 滞回阈值在本地不可靠时交给 Claude Sonnet 云端并保持至恢复,handoff memory 以观测窗口加情节摘要保留验证进度与失败上下文。在 Habitat、EmbodiedBench、VLABench 上对比 Local-only、Cloud-only、Hi Robot*、RouteLLM*、AdaPlanner,CARE 相对最强协作基线提升 6.3–18.3 个百分点,相对 Cloud-only 中位动作间隔延迟降低 28.8–82.6%,只用约三成云请求。匹配预算实验表明收益来自选择有用干预状态而非更多云调用,移除 memory 后升级点成功率降至 25%。局限是未在物理平台、传感噪声与网络波动下验证。
为什么重要 对闭环具身系统里权衡云端强推理与本地低延迟的工程,CARE 给出可落地的状态化升级策略和共享交接记忆,避免逐请求路由。适合 做云-本地具身智能体、VLA 部署、闭环控制调度的工程师与研究者。
基础模型智能体的最新进展使具身系统在长程规划与交互方面越来越强。然而,具身智能体在持续感知并作用于不断变化的环境时需要快速、闭环的决策。部署强大的云端智能体会在连续动作之间让平台空闲数秒,而轻量级本地模型响应迅速但更容易出错。现有分层架构通常为模型分配固定角色,而传统模型路由器做出的是无状态的逐请求决策。我们提出了 CARE,一个由评判器引导的自适应执行框架,它动态决定何时将控制从本地执行器升级到更强的云端模型。一个轻量级评判器模型监控执行可靠性,并在本地执行变得不可靠时触发升级;一旦升级,控制会持续到智能体恢复,避免逐级切换。为支持这种控制转移,共享的交接记忆在各执行器之间维护执行上下文和任务级进度,使模型能够无需从头开始即可介入。在多个不同具身基准上,CARE 将任务成功率相比最强评估协作基线提高了 6.3-18.3 个百分点。CARE 进一步接近或超过仅用云端的成功率,同时将动作间延迟的中位数降低 28.8-82.6%。
Recent advances in foundation-model agents have enabled increasingly capable embodied systems for long-horizon planning and interaction.
However, embodied agents require fast, closed-loop decisions as they continuously perceive and act on a changing environment.
Deploying strong cloud agents leaves the platform idle for seconds between consecutive actions, while lightweight local models respond quickly but are more vulnerable to errors.
Existing hierarchical architectures typically assign models fixed roles, whereas conventional model routers make stateless per-request decisions.
We present CARE, a critic-guided adaptive execution framework that dynamically determines when to escalate control from a local executor to a stronger cloud model.
A lightweight critic model monitors execution reliability and triggers escalation when local execution becomes unreliable; once escalated, control persists until the agent recovers, avoiding step-wise switching.
To support such control transfer, a shared handoff memory maintains execution context and task-level progress across executors, enabling the model to intervene without restarting from scratch.
Across diverse embodied benchmarks, CARE improves task success by 6.3-18.3 percentage points over the strongest evaluated collaboration baseline.
CARE further approaches or exceeds Cloud-only success while reducing median time-between-action latency by 28.8-82.6%.
Habitat
Cloud-only 4.61s
EmbodiedBench
Cloud-only 4.41s
VLABench
Cloud-only 2.47s
critic 开销
P5–P95 percentiles
注释 · E2E 全降 4.4–34.8%;critic 开销独立报告。出自 表 1、图 5


EVIDENCE / METHODS
表格
CARE 三基准 SR 92.5/75.0/87.5%,Habitat 与 VLABench 超过 Cloud-only。
| 方法 | Habitat SR (%) | EmbodiedBench SR ( | VLABench SR (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Local-only | 64.2 | 40.0 | 71.2 |
| Cloud-only | 91.7 | 80.0 | 85.0 |
| AdaPlanner | 74.2 | 58.8 | 81.2 |
| CARE | 92.5 | 75.0 | 87.5 |
注释 · AdaPlanner 是最强协作基线,CARE 相对其提升 6.3–18.3 个百分点。出自 表 1
原版排版与图表 · 手机无法内嵌时可在浏览器打开。PDF 插件内选文不能传给网页助手。