arxiv.org·2026/10/13·Xuyang Liu / Shihao Wang 等
为什么重要 统一全模态视频定位与理解评测,揭示开源模型在音视频理解上的差距,可用于多模态模型选型与诊断。
随着多模态大语言模型(MLLMs)快速发展,评估其视频理解能力变得越来越重要。现有视频理解基准只覆盖部分评估维度,限制了全模态视频理解的系统性诊断。我们提出 OmniCompass,一个用于全模态视频定位与理解的全面基准。
OmniCompass 定义两个评估轨道:OmniCompass-VL 在需要视觉证据的任务上评估视觉语言模型,而 OmniCompass-AV 在需要音视频联合证据的任务上评估全模态模型。每个轨道包含三个互补任务:时序定位(TG)、空间定位(SG)和问答(QA),分别评估指定目标何时出现、位于何处以及发生了什么。QA 在 OmniCompass-VL 中覆盖五个感知类别和三个推理类别,在 OmniCompass-AV 中覆盖三个感知类别和两个推理类别。
OmniCompass-VL 包含 820 个视频和 2,460 个实例,跨多个领域和三种时长类型:短、中、长。一个叙事和音频丰富的子集构成 OmniCompass-AV,包含 240 个视频和 720 个实例。每个实例在两种配对设置下评估:纯文本和文本+图像,通过文本和视觉语言引导指定相同目标。所有实例均经过多轮质量验证的人工标注。
对 50 个 MLLMs 的评估表明,开源模型仍落后于专有模型,尤其在音视频理解方面。精确的时序和空间定位即使对领先模型仍具挑战性,其预测在配对目标规格之间仍表现出不一致。
With the rapid development of multimodal large language models (MLLMs), evaluating their video understanding capabilities has become increasingly important.
Existing video understanding benchmarks cover only part of the evaluation dimensions, limiting systematic diagnosis of omni-modal video understanding.
We introduce OmniCompass, a holistic benchmark for omni-modal video grounding and understanding.
OmniCompass defines two evaluation tracks: OmniCompass-VL assesses vision-language models on tasks requiring visual evidence, while OmniCompass-AV assesses omni-modal models on tasks requiring joint audio-visual evidence.
Each track includes three complementary tasks: temporal grounding (TG), spatial grounding (SG), and question answering (QA), assessing when a referenced target appears, where it is, and what happens.
QA covers five perception and three reasoning categories in OmniCompass-VL, and three perception and two reasoning categories in OmniCompass-AV.
OmniCompass-VL contains 820 videos and 2,460 instances across domains and three duration types: short, medium, and long.
A narrative- and audio-rich subset forms OmniCompass-AV with 240 videos and 720 instances.
Each instance is evaluated under two paired settings: text-only and text+image, specifying the same target through text and visual-language guidance.
All instances are manually annotated with multi-round quality verification.
Evaluations of 50 MLLMs show that open-source models still lag behind proprietary counterparts, particularly in audio-visual understanding.
Precise temporal and spatial grounding remains challenging even for leading models, and their predictions still exhibit inconsistencies across the paired target specifications.
原版排版与图表 · 手机无法内嵌时可在浏览器打开。PDF 插件内选文不能传给网页助手。